MolluscaBase name details
Viquesnelia Deshayes, 1857
1302009 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1302009)
uncertain > nomen dubium
Genus
Viquesnelia lenticularis Deshayes, 1857 † (type by monotypy)
- Species Viquesnelia atlantica Morelet, 1860 accepted as Plutonia atlantica (Morelet, 1860) (original combination)
- Species Viquesnelia dussumieri P. Fischer, 1857 accepted as Mariaella dussumieri L. Pfeiffer, 1855 (synonym and secondary homonym)
- Species Viquesnelia lenticularis Deshayes, 1857 † (uncertain > nomen dubium)
recent + fossil
feminine
Deshayes, G. P. (1857). Note sur un nouveau Genre de Limacien fossile. <em>Journal de Conchyliologie.</em> 5(3): 283-289., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15862342
page(s): 287-289 [details]
page(s): 287-289 [details]
Status The genus, which is based on a species described from supposedly Eocene strata of Balouk Keui near Alexandroupoli, NE...
Status The genus, which is based on a species described from supposedly Eocene strata of Balouk Keui near Alexandroupoli, NE Greece, was initially conceived to be a terrestrial slug (“limacien”) by Deshayes (1857). Based on findings in Sarmatian (middle Miocene) deposits in the Dardanelles of what was believed to be the same species, Gude (1912) suggested that Viquesnelia is probably not a terrestrial snail but the operculum of a viviparid, perhaps of the genus Tylopoma Brusina, 1882. While it is questionable whether the Eocene and the Sarmatian fossils are related, the resemblance of Viquesnelia lenticularis with an operculum is indeed striking. The relationship with Tylopoma is unlikely, since that genus is only known from latest Miocene to Pliocene deposits of Croatia, Romania and Georgia.
Since the taxonomic validity, the systematic position and the stratigraphic age of Viquesnelia are doubtful, the taxon is regarded as a nomen dubium. The suggestion by Gude (1912) to place it in the Viviparidae is followed. [details]
Since the taxonomic validity, the systematic position and the stratigraphic age of Viquesnelia are doubtful, the taxon is regarded as a nomen dubium. The suggestion by Gude (1912) to place it in the Viviparidae is followed. [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Viquesnelia Deshayes, 1857. Accessed at: http://molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1302009 on 2024-04-20
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Deshayes, G. P. (1857). Note sur un nouveau Genre de Limacien fossile. <em>Journal de Conchyliologie.</em> 5(3): 283-289., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15862342
page(s): 287-289 [details]
page(s): 287-289 [details]
From editor or global species database
Status The genus, which is based on a species described from supposedly Eocene strata of Balouk Keui near Alexandroupoli, NE Greece, was initially conceived to be a terrestrial slug (“limacien”) by Deshayes (1857). Based on findings in Sarmatian (middle Miocene) deposits in the Dardanelles of what was believed to be the same species, Gude (1912) suggested that Viquesnelia is probably not a terrestrial snail but the operculum of a viviparid, perhaps of the genus Tylopoma Brusina, 1882. While it is questionable whether the Eocene and the Sarmatian fossils are related, the resemblance of Viquesnelia lenticularis with an operculum is indeed striking. The relationship with Tylopoma is unlikely, since that genus is only known from latest Miocene to Pliocene deposits of Croatia, Romania and Georgia.Since the taxonomic validity, the systematic position and the stratigraphic age of Viquesnelia are doubtful, the taxon is regarded as a nomen dubium. The suggestion by Gude (1912) to place it in the Viviparidae is followed. [details]
