MolluscaBase name details
Auricula subbiplicata A. d'Orbigny, 1852 †
1344446 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1344446)
unaccepted > junior objective synonym (unnecessary replacement name)
Species
Auricula Lamarck, 1799 accepted as Ellobium Röding, 1798
fossil only
Orbigny, A. D. d'. (1852). <i>Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, faisant suite au cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques</i>. vol. 3: 189 pp. + unpaginated erratum and table of contents. Paris: Masson. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31730040
page(s): 26 [details]
page(s): 26 [details]
Status Introduced as replacement name for "Auricula biplicata Grateloup, 1847, non Deshayes, 1830". However, Grateloup introduced...
Status Introduced as replacement name for "Auricula biplicata Grateloup, 1847, non Deshayes, 1830". However, Grateloup introduced the taxon already in 1828 (and it is not a nomen nudum there as claimed by Wenz 1923). Therefore, it is not a junior homonym but a senior homonym of Auricula biplicata Deshayes, 1830 (latter of which is permanently invalid). [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Auricula subbiplicata d'Orbigny, 1852 †. Accessed at: http://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1344446 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Orbigny, A. D. d'. (1852). <i>Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, faisant suite au cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques</i>. vol. 3: 189 pp. + unpaginated erratum and table of contents. Paris: Masson. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31730040
page(s): 26 [details]
page(s): 26 [details]
From editor or global species database
Status Introduced as replacement name for "Auricula biplicata Grateloup, 1847, non Deshayes, 1830". However, Grateloup introduced the taxon already in 1828 (and it is not a nomen nudum there as claimed by Wenz 1923). Therefore, it is not a junior homonym but a senior homonym of Auricula biplicata Deshayes, 1830 (latter of which is permanently invalid). [details]
