MolluscaBase taxon details
Phasianema taurocrassum (Sacco, 1895) †
1631531 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1631531)
accepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
(of Fossarus (Phasianema) costatum var. taurocrassa Sacco, 1895 †) Sacco, F. (1895). I Molluschi dei terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria. Parte XVIII. (Melaniidae, Littorinidae, Fossaridae, Rissoidae, Hydrobiidae, Paludinidae e Valvatidae). Torino: Carlo Clausen. 51 pp., 1 pl. [30 September 1895]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/46676
page(s): 18 [details]
page(s): 18 [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2025). MolluscaBase. Phasianema taurocrassum (Sacco, 1895) †. Accessed at: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1631531 on 2025-09-11
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Fossarus (Phasianema) costatum var. taurocrassa Sacco, 1895 †) Sacco, F. (1895). I Molluschi dei terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria. Parte XVIII. (Melaniidae, Littorinidae, Fossaridae, Rissoidae, Hydrobiidae, Paludinidae e Valvatidae). Torino: Carlo Clausen. 51 pp., 1 pl. [30 September 1895]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/46676
page(s): 18 [details]
basis of record Kiel, S.; Sami, M.; Taviani, M. (2023). Unusual Miocene hydrocarbon-seep faunas from the Brisighella area in northern Italy: embedded in clastics and first records of the lucinid bivalves <i>Megaxinus</i> and <i>Miltha</i>. <em>Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.</em> 68: DOI 10.4202/app.01021.2022., available online at https://doi.org/10.4202/app.01021.2022
note: "more likely belongs to the vetigastropod family Cataegidae" [details]
page(s): 18 [details]
basis of record Kiel, S.; Sami, M.; Taviani, M. (2023). Unusual Miocene hydrocarbon-seep faunas from the Brisighella area in northern Italy: embedded in clastics and first records of the lucinid bivalves <i>Megaxinus</i> and <i>Miltha</i>. <em>Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.</em> 68: DOI 10.4202/app.01021.2022., available online at https://doi.org/10.4202/app.01021.2022
note: "more likely belongs to the vetigastropod family Cataegidae" [details]