MolluscaBase name details
Spiniscala merignacensis Cossmann, 1912 †
1771361 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1771361)
unaccepted > superseded combination
Species
Spiniscala de Boury, 1900 accepted as Epitonium Röding, 1798
- Variety Spiniscala merignacensis var. crassicostulifera Cossmann & Peyrot, 1922 † accepted as Epitonium merignacense (Cossmann, 1912) † (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
- Variety Spiniscala merignacensis var. polycolpata Cossmann & Peyrot, 1922 † accepted as Epitonium merignacense (Cossmann, 1912) † (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
Cossmann, M. (1912). Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Neuvième livraison. Paris, The author and J. Lamarre & Cie. 215 pp., 10 pls. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/112976
page(s): 168, pl. 1, figs 30, 31; note: authorship attributed to de Boury who apparently determined the species (see footnote on p. 165); the description seems to be from Cossmann though [details]
page(s): 168, pl. 1, figs 30, 31; note: authorship attributed to de Boury who apparently determined the species (see footnote on p. 165); the description seems to be from Cossmann though [details]
Type locality contained in France
type locality contained in France [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2025). MolluscaBase. Spiniscala merignacensis Cossmann, 1912 †. Accessed at: https://molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1771361 on 2025-04-27
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Cossmann, M. (1912). Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Neuvième livraison. Paris, The author and J. Lamarre & Cie. 215 pp., 10 pls. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/112976
page(s): 168, pl. 1, figs 30, 31; note: authorship attributed to de Boury who apparently determined the species (see footnote on p. 165); the description seems to be from Cossmann though [details]
page(s): 168, pl. 1, figs 30, 31; note: authorship attributed to de Boury who apparently determined the species (see footnote on p. 165); the description seems to be from Cossmann though [details]



