original description
(of Hypanis caspia filatovae Logvinenko & Starobogatov, 1967) Logvinenko B. M. & Starobogatov Ya. I. (1967). On the study of species composition of the fauna of bivalvian molluscs in tanatocenoses of underwater slope of Azerbaijan coast. In: An experience of geologo-geomorphological and hydrobiological studies of coastal zone of the sea. Leningrad, Nauka: 225-235 [in Russian].
page(s): 231 [details]
basis of record
Poorten, J.J. ter, 2005. Outline of a systematic index - Recent Cardiidae (Lamarck, 1809). VISAYA net. (Updated 2009 for WoRMS), available online at http://www.conchology.be/en/shelltopics/visaya-net/date.php?year=2005 [details]
additional source
Kantor, Y. I.; Vinarski, M. V.; Schileyko, A. A.; Sysoev, A. V. (2010). Catalogue of the continental mollusks of Russia and adjacent territories. Version 2.3.1. , available online at http://www.ruthenica.com/documents/Continental_Russian_molluscs_ver2-3-1.pdf [details]
additional source
Bogutskaya, N.G.; Kijashko, P.V.; Naseka, A.M.; Orlova, M.I. (2013). Opredelitel' ryb i bespozvonochnykh Kaspiyskogo morya. T. 1. Ryby i mollyuski [ldentification keys for fish and invertebrates. Volume 1. Fish and molluscs]. КМК Scientific Press Ltd., St. Petersburg/Moscow. 543 pp., 56 pl. [In Russian]. [details] Available for editors
[request]
status source
Wesselingh, F. P.; Neubauer, T. A.; Anistratenko, V. V.; Vinarski, M.; Yanina, T.; ter Poorten, J. J.; Kijashko, P.; Albrecht, C.; Anistratenko, O. Y.; D'Hont, A.; Frolov, P.; Gándara, A. M.; Gittenberger, A.; Gogaladze, A.; Karpinsky, M.; Lattuada, M.; Popa, L.; Sands, A. F.; Van de Velde, S.; Vandendorpe, J.; Wilke, T. (2019). Mollusc species from the Pontocaspian region – an expert opinion list. <em>ZooKeys.</em> 827: 31-124., available online at https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.827.31365 [details] Available for editors
[request]
From editor or global species database
Type locality Azerbaijan, ‘Gulf of Baku (western Caspian Sea)’ (Kantor et al., 2010) [details]
Type material ZIN 1/44-1897, holotype (Bogutskaya et al., 2013) [details]
Validity The species has been listed as accepted in recent species catalogues, but there is considerable doubt about its validity given the morphological similarity to congeners (see Wesselingh et al. 2019). Until molecular data are available to ascertain its identity, we treat the present species as a nomen dubium. [details]