MolluscaBase name details
Adelactaeon Cossmann, 1895
397010 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:397010)
unaccepted
Genus
Myonia japonica A. Adams, 1860 accepted as Leucotina japonica (A. Adams, 1860) (type by typification of replaced name)
- Species Adelactaeon amoenus (A. Adams, 1853) accepted as Monotygma amoena (A. Adams, 1853)
- Species Adelactaeon elongata van Aartsen, Gittenberger & Goud, 1998 accepted as Leucotina elongata (van Aartsen, Gittenberger & Goud, 1998)
- Species Adelactaeon fulvus (A. Adams, 1853) accepted as Monotigma fulva (A. Adams, 1853) accepted as Monotygma fulva (A. Adams, 1853)
- Species Adelactaeon lilyae van Aartsen, Gittenberger & Goud, 1998 accepted as Leucotina lilyae (van Aartsen, Gittenberger & Goud, 1998)
- Species Adelactaeon puncturata (E. A. Smith, 1872) accepted as Leucotina puncturata (E. A. Smith, 1872)
marine
Cossmann, M. (1895). Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Première livraison. Paris, The author and Comptoir Géologique. 159 pp., 7 pls., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36852875
page(s): 54 [details]
page(s): 54 [details]
Note This is a replacement name, so according to...
Type species This is a replacement name, so according to ICZN art. 67.8. has the same type species as the replaced name "despite any statement to the contrary". Therefore, the statement by Cossmann (1895) of Tornatella papyracea Basterot, 1825 as type species is invalid. [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Adelactaeon Cossmann, 1895. Accessed at: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=397010 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
2009-06-03 09:38:17Z
created
db_admin
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Cossmann, M. (1895). Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Première livraison. Paris, The author and Comptoir Géologique. 159 pp., 7 pls., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36852875
page(s): 54 [details]
page(s): 54 [details]
From editor or global species database
Type species This is a replacement name, so according to ICZN art. 67.8. has the same type species as the replaced name "despite any statement to the contrary". Therefore, the statement by Cossmann (1895) of Tornatella papyracea Basterot, 1825 as type species is invalid. [details]
