original description
Eichwald, E. (1838). Faunae Caspii Maris primitiae. <em>Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou.</em> 11(2): 125-174., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/41342125
page(s): 168-169 [details]
original description
(of Hypanis caspia grossui Scarlato & Starobogatov, 1972) Scarlato O. A. & Y. I. Starobogatov. (1972). Class bivalve molluscs – Bivalvia. In: Guide to the fauna of the Black and Azov seas. Vol. 3. Kiev, Naukova Dumka: 178-249 [in Russian].
page(s): 214 [details]
original description
(of Cardium pseudocardium Deshayes, 1838) Deshayes, G. P. (1838). Description des coquilles fossiles recueillies en Crimée par M. de Verneuil, et observations générales à leur sujet. <em>Mémoires de la Société géologique de France.</em> Sér. 1, 3, 37-69., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/42370331
page(s): 59, pl. 1, figs 1-2 [details]
additional source
Wesselingh, F.P. & H. Alçiçek. (2010). A new cardiid bivalve from the Pliocene Baklan Basin (Turkey) and the origin of modern Ponto-Caspian taxa. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 53 (4): 711-719., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00958.x [details]
status source
Wesselingh, F. P.; Neubauer, T. A.; Anistratenko, V. V.; Vinarski, M.; Yanina, T.; ter Poorten, J. J.; Kijashko, P.; Albrecht, C.; Anistratenko, O. Y.; D'Hont, A.; Frolov, P.; Gándara, A. M.; Gittenberger, A.; Gogaladze, A.; Karpinsky, M.; Lattuada, M.; Popa, L.; Sands, A. F.; Van de Velde, S.; Vandendorpe, J.; Wilke, T. (2019). Mollusc species from the Pontocaspian region – an expert opinion list. <em>ZooKeys.</em> 827: 31-124., available online at https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.827.31365 [details] Available for editors
[request]
From editor or global species database
Type locality Black Sea, ‘ostio Tyrae versus Pontum Euxinum, prope Businowatajam’ [details]
Type material Not located [details]
Validity The species has been listed as accepted in recent species catalogues, but there is considerable doubt about its validity given the morphological similarity to congeners (see Wesselingh et al. 2019). Until molecular data are available to ascertain its identity, we treat the present species as a nomen dubium. [details]