MolluscaBase name details
Cyrena gravii Deshayes, 1825 †
1547501 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1547501)
unaccepted > superseded combination (genus is a junior synonym)
Species
fossil only
Deshayes, G. P. (1824-1837). <i>Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris</i>. Paris, published by the author. Vol 1 (Bivalvia): pp. 1-80, pls 1-11 [1824], 81-170, pls 12-29 [1825], 171-238, pls 30-36 [1829], 239-322, pls 37-46 [1830], 323-392 [1832]; vol. 2: pp. 1-80, pls 1-8 [1824], 81-146, pls 9-17 [1825], 147-290, pls 18-40 [1832], 291-426, pls 41-61 [1833], 427-498, pls 62-78 [1834], 499-780, pls 79-106 [1835], 781-814 [1837]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/52303
page(s): Vol. 1, p. 120, pl. 19, figs 3, 4 [details]
page(s): Vol. 1, p. 120, pl. 19, figs 3, 4 [details]
Type locality contained in France
type locality contained in France [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Cyrena gravii Deshayes, 1825 †. Accessed at: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1547501 on 2025-07-08
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Deshayes, G. P. (1824-1837). <i>Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris</i>. Paris, published by the author. Vol 1 (Bivalvia): pp. 1-80, pls 1-11 [1824], 81-170, pls 12-29 [1825], 171-238, pls 30-36 [1829], 239-322, pls 37-46 [1830], 323-392 [1832]; vol. 2: pp. 1-80, pls 1-8 [1824], 81-146, pls 9-17 [1825], 147-290, pls 18-40 [1832], 291-426, pls 41-61 [1833], 427-498, pls 62-78 [1834], 499-780, pls 79-106 [1835], 781-814 [1837]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/52303
page(s): Vol. 1, p. 120, pl. 19, figs 3, 4 [details]
page(s): Vol. 1, p. 120, pl. 19, figs 3, 4 [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Spelling In the Erratum section of the second volume (p. 810), Deshayes stated that the name "Gravii" is a misspelling for "Gravesii", considering that he named the species after the locality Graves. However, since the correction is not done in the same volume, gravesii cannot be considered a valid correction but must be treated as an incorrect subsequent spelling. [details]
