MolluscaBase name details
Lymnaea virginiana Lamarck, 1822
1462623 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1462623)
unaccepted
Species
Limnaea virginiana Lamarck, 1822 · unaccepted > superseded combination
recent only
Lamarck, [J.-B. M.] de. (1822). Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Tome sixième, 2me partie. Paris: published by the Author, 232 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13181853
page(s): 160 [details]
page(s): 160 [details]
Note Stated as "USA, Virginia" which is evidently wrong
From editor or global species database
Type locality Stated as "USA, Virginia" which is evidently wrong [details]
Taxonomic remark Baker (1911) regarded the taxonomic identity of this Lamarck’s name as “unidentifiable”. The shell of the single...
Taxonomic remark Baker (1911) regarded the taxonomic identity of this Lamarck’s name as “unidentifiable”. The shell of the single syntype (see Mermod, 1952 for illustration) resembles shells of Racesina luteola (Lamarck, 1822). Possibly, the information about origin of this specimen (Virginia) was wrong and actually it was collected in India (Mermod, 1952). [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2021). MolluscaBase. Lymnaea virginiana Lamarck, 1822. Accessed at: http://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1462623 on 2024-04-26
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Lamarck, [J.-B. M.] de. (1822). Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Tome sixième, 2me partie. Paris: published by the Author, 232 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13181853
page(s): 160 [details]
page(s): 160 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Baker (1911) regarded the taxonomic identity of this Lamarck’s name as “unidentifiable”. The shell of the single syntype (see Mermod, 1952 for illustration) resembles shells of Racesina luteola (Lamarck, 1822). Possibly, the information about origin of this specimen (Virginia) was wrong and actually it was collected in India (Mermod, 1952). [details]Type locality Stated as "USA, Virginia" which is evidently wrong [details]
