original description
Bouillet, J.-B. (1834). Description historique et scientifique de la Haute-Auvergne (département du Cantal); suivie d'un tableau alphabétique des roches et minéraux du même département, avec l'indication de leurs gisemen[t]s et accompagnée d'un atlas de 35 planches gravées ou lithographiées. Paris, J.-B. Baillière; 439 pp., 35 pls., available online at https://books.google.fr/books?id=yvBAAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
page(s): pl. 18, fig. 1 (description in plate caption) [details]
source of synonymy
Wenz, W. (1923-1930). Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia. Gastropoda extramarina tertiaria. W. Junk, Berlin. Vol. I: 1-352 pp. (1923), Vol. II: 353-736 pp. (1923), Vol. III: 737-1068 pp. (1923), Vol. IV: 1069-1420 pp. (1923), Vol. V: 1421-1734 pp. (1923), Vol. VI: 1735-1862 pp. (1923), Vol. VII: 1863-2230 pp. (1926), Vol. VIII: 2231-2502 pp. (1928), Vol. IX: 2503-2886 pp. (1929), Vol. X: 2887-3014 pp. (1929), Vol. XI: 3015-3387 pp. (1930)., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/61839#/summary
page(s): 718 [details]
From editor or global species database
Status Bouillet (1834) used the suffix "antiqua ?" (always with question mark) for several species illustrated in his work (including several in the genus Helix). Obviously, they were not intended as new names but to indicate a taxon's fossil state. Therefore, they should not be considered available names and cannot consistute junior homonyms. Wenz (1923) seemed to follow the same concept and listed the nameas synonym of the younger Helix denainvillieri [sic] de Boissy, 1839. [details]